Wednesday, 03 June 2009
-
Climate of Hate, World of Double Standards
Michelle Malkin :: Townhall.com Columnist
When a right-wing Christian vigilante kills, millions of fingers pull the trigger. When a left-wing Muslim vigilante kills, he kills alone. These are the instantly ossifying narratives in the Sunday shooting death of late-term abortion provider George Tiller of Kansas versus the Monday shootings of two Arkansas military recruiters.
Tiller's suspected murderer, Scott Roeder, is white, Christian, anti-government and anti-abortion. The gunman in the military recruitment center attack, Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad, is black, a Muslim convert, anti-military and anti-American.
Both crimes are despicable, cowardly acts of domestic terrorism. But the disparate treatment of the two brutal cases by both the White House and the media is striking.
President Obama issued a statement condemning "heinous acts of violence" within hours of Tiller's death. The Justice Department issued its own statement and sent federal marshals to protect abortion clinics. News anchors and headline writers abandoned all qualms about labeling the gunman a terrorist. An almost gleeful excess of mainstream commentary poured forth on the climate of hate and fear created by conservative talk radio, blogs and Fox News in reporting Tiller's activities.
By contrast, Obama was silent about the military recruiter attacks that left 24-year-old Pvt. William Long dead and 18-year-old Pvt. Quinton Ezeagwula gravely wounded. On Tuesday afternoon -- more than 24 hours after the attack on the military recruitment center in Little Rock, Ark. -- Obama held a press conference to announce his pick for Army secretary. It would have been exactly the right moment to express condolences for the families of the targeted Army recruiters and to condemn heinous acts of violence against our troops.
But Obama said nothing. The Justice Department was mum. And so were the legions of finger-pointing pundits happily convicting the pro-life movement and every right-leaning writer on the planet of contributing to the murder of Tiller. Obama's omission, it should be noted, comes just a few weeks after he failed to mention the Bronx jihadi plot to bomb synagogues and a National Guard airbase during his speech on homeland security.
Why the silence? Politically and religiously motivated violence, it seems, is only worth lamenting when it demonizes opponents. Which also helps explain why the phrase "lone shooter" is ubiquitous in media coverage of jihadi shooters gone wild -- think convicted "Jeep Jihadist" Mohammed Taheri-Azar at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill or Israel-bashing gunman Naveed Haq, who targeted a Seattle Jewish charity or Los Angeles International Airport shooter Hesham Hedayet, who opened fire at the El Al Israeli airline ticket counter -- but not in cases involving rare acts of anti-abortion violence.
Even Jeffrey Goldberg of the left-leaning Atlantic magazine noticed the double standards. He called attention to a National Public Radio report on the military recruiter attack that failed to mention the religion and anti-military animus of the suspect. Wrote Goldberg: "Why not tell people what is actually happening in the world? We saw this a couple of weeks ago, when the press only gingerly acknowledged that the malevolent though incompetent suspects in the synagogue bombing-conspiracy case in New York were converts to Islam. How is the public served by this kind of silence? The extremist Christian beliefs of George Tiller's alleged murderer are certainly relevant to that case, and no one in my profession is hesitant to discuss them. Why the hesitancy to talk about the motivations of the man who allegedly killed Pvt. William Long?"
The truth is that the "climate of hate" doesn't have just one hemisphere. But you won't hear the Council on American-Islamic Relations acknowledging the national security risks of jihadi infiltrators who despise our military and have plotted against our troops from within the ranks -- including convicted fragging killer Hasan Akbar and terror plotters Ali Mohamed, Jeffrey Battle and Semi Osman.
You won't hear about the escalating war on military recruitment centers on the op-ed pages of The New York Times -- from vandalism to obstruction to Molotov cocktail attacks on campus stations across the country; to the shutdown of a Pittsburgh military recruitment office by zealots holding signs that read "Recruiters are Child Predators"; to the prolonged harassment campaign against the Marine recruiting center in Berkeley, where Code Pink protesters called America soldiers assassins; to the bomb blast at the Times Square recruiting center last March.
And you'll certainly hear little about the most recent left-wing calls to violence by a Playboy magazine writer who published a vulgar list of conservative female writers and commentators he said he'd like to rape (the obscene slang word he used is not printable). The list was hyped by the magazine's publicity team and light-heartedly promoted by mainstream publications such as Politico.com (founded by Washington Post reporters).
Is it too much to ask the media cartographers in charge of mapping the "climate of hate" to do their jobs with both eyes open?
Post a Comment
- Back to str8tguy69's Xanga Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in str8tguy69's local time zone: GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)



Comments (12)
it shouldn't be.
And few will notice this no matter who hared we try and point it out
I think both murders are horrible.
There are times when I've heard peole criticize Christianity and not Islam. To be fair, though, I've heard the opposite of what you're saying as well. There are some people who blame Islam for terrorism, but don't call it terrorism when a Christian commits an equivalent crime. Also, sometimes I think the response is unequal. For example, I remember that there were some people who thought that Muslims should have special registration because of Islamic terrorist attacks, but something equivalent is not done if a Christian person is responsible for an attack.
Each side seems to defend its own religion by saying "That person's not a real Christian, Muslim, etc., and say that that's not really what their faith says. Sometimes, these same people who can't see the bad parts of their own religion find it all too easy to see the bad parts of other people's religions. It depends on who's talking.
Ultimately, though, the crimes are horrible regardless of the faith of the person who commits them.
Indeed. Part of the reason I've been unwilling to join the calls of Republicans for "moderate Muslims" to denounce each and every terrorist act committed in the name of Islam is that I recognize the unfair standard as applied to the pro-life movement. It seems when pro-lifers denounce the murder they are attacked for being dishonest or not sincere enough, much like when a Muslim denounces terrorism. Both cases strike me as projection.
@randomneuralfirings - I like that... we need to fall away from the swinging pendulum syndrome and search out real truth. Genealogies are to be shunned when they are expressed in the domination
of warped and pedantic loyalties. Blind adherence to obsolete tradition
and refusal to accept "truth" which does not bear the hallmark of
origin with our particular school of political or social allegiance, It
puts us into a class of the occasional pet dog or cat, which will not
eat anything except from it's accustomed plate. It very well may be the
best food in the world, but unless it is set on it's own sanctified
plate with garnish and a special fringe around it. The food will go
untouched.
http://str8tguy69.xanga.com/701000059/titus-39-shun-genealogies/
here is a post I wrote last month that perhaps would have garnered more attention had i left the last part off but i could not as hard as i tried shy away from the fact that the Church has some growing of it's own to do
Stopping by on a rec.
It shouldn't be too much to ask of them. To be honest, I'm really tired of the American media sheltering us from facts they don't think we should know about. It isn't their job to shape our thoughts. They just need to do their job -- reporting -- and people will make of it what they will. We're not children.
Regrettably, the media isn't trying to shelter us, but they are using every opportunity to try to shape what we think. It is the media that uses its own form of propaganda to create the climate of hate and fear by the way they portray Christians, pro-lifers, conservatives, or any other group of people that they don't like. The media's distorted portrayal of these people (which is many of us) often remind me of the stereotypes and caricatures of the Jews in Nazi propaganda posters.
Boss_Lady said it better than I could. How true it is,
It is worth noting that Dr. Tiller's shooter, Scott Roeder has a long history of mental illness. I touched on how little Franky is a hypocrite in my treatment of this as well.
the first two sentences say it all...tsk, tsk...and aint it the truth...
@Jedi_Master_713 - i wouldn't go so far as to say the people aren't christian or muslim...they are just wacky do, crazier than an outhouse mouse christian or muslim...they also belong to lots of other labels...none of them make a shred of difference..it is their action alone (unless some group claims responsiblity, like many muslim groups do)
@tialoca_talks - I agree. They may be Christian or Muslim, but maybe have some different interpretation or additional extremism that others don't have. Ultimately, I think people are responsible for their own actions. Others may blamed if they actually participated in planning the crime, etc.
I would disagree with people who praise the crimes but don't participate in it. I think they're being rather heartless and are wrong to encourage the violence. However, I don't think they should go to jail, since they should have the right to express their views as long as they are not hurting anyone.